Wednesday, April 02, 2008

The Masculine Glory of Figure Skating??

Mariah and I sometimes argue about whether figure skating is really a sport. I say no for a simple reason: sport involves direct and objective competition against others. In track, for instance, the athletes compete directly with each other to see who can get the best time. They can see the other athletes next to them trying to run faster. In tennis, one competes directly against the opponent across the net. But in figure skating, the skaters simply try to impress judges who, in turn, seem to give their scores for completely subjective reasons. Sure, there are certain penalties for falling and missteps, but then sometimes the judges seem to discount them or increase them. And what about artistic merit? That’s the most subjective thing on Earth. But let me be clear: I don’t intend at all to belittle the strength, dexterity, training, and general physical prowess necessary to do the things that figure skaters do; I simply do not consider that activity a sport because there is no direct, objective competition between the skaters.

Into this semantic mess comes Blades of Glory, a brilliant figure skating comedy starring Jon Heder and Will Ferrell. Mariah and I first saw it in Chicago with Megan on a day when JJ had so much to write about Hegel that he couldn’t come with us.. The film mocks all of the ridiculous crap about figure skating that, in my view, comes from the lack of direct, objective competition between skaters. For instance, it mocks the possibility of ties when officials give two skaters the same score by having Chazz Michael Michaels (Ferrell) and Jimmy MacElroy (Heder) both win the gold at the beginning of the movie. All of the shoving and jostling for position atop the gold medal platform eventually escalates into a full-out fight between the two rivals, hinting at all of the needless tension that must exist between all of these highly trained athletes who have no way of really competing with each other in a fair way for the medals. Between Michaels and MacElroy, each skater believes himself to have earned the medal and performed better than the other, but there’s absolutely no way to settle the dispute on the ice. In real sports, such a dispute would be settled by an overtime period, or a tiebreaker method involving the comparison of win-loss records against identical competition; it would be settled by actual athletic performance, not by a bunch of pretentious, politically influenced fops posing as judges at a table.

But a wonderful side-effect of the absurdity of real-life figure skating is that it puts Will Ferrell at his best. I cannot stop laughing when he slaps the table, or whatever surface is around, and yells “Boom!” after making an offensive or egotistical statement at his circus-style press conferences or during other opportunities to speak. However, the highlight has to be the unglamorous masculinity Ferrell brings to a sport whose male population (so the stereotype goes) generally includes only effeminate prettyboys like MacElroy. But with Michaels, the skating world gets a hairy, slightly chubby, sex-addicted bad boy. While the film suggests that the female population as a whole finds Michaels irresistible, he’s clearly not very attractive, and it’s in these kinds of absurd situations that Ferrell is at his best.

Admittedly, no blog about Blades of Glory written by a straight dude would be complete without at least a brief discussion of Jenna Fischer and her role as the sister of the evil pairs team Stranz and Fairchild. The mainstream discussion of her attractiveness always focuses on how she “dresses down” in The Office so as to look like “an ordinary woman.” While this suggests that “ordinary women” are somehow less attractive than airbrushed, dolled-up movie stars, I happen to think that so-called “ordinary women” are often quite attractive! And in Blades of Glory, Jenna Fischer has another opportunity to “dress down” because she’s playing the role of the supposedly plain sister of the glamorous Stranz and Fairchild. Of course, she’s terribly attractive in that role. Her everygirlness, if that term makes sense, is irresistible. She even manages to bring that characteristic to the scene where she gets all dolled-up because her brother and sister have guilted her into trying to seduce the sex-addicted Michaels in order to create conflict between Michaels and MacElroy, the all-male skating pair. At any rate, Jenna Fischer’s appeal in Blades of Glory, though comedic, does compare to other legendarily attractive female performances like Penelope Cruz in Abre los Ojos and Parminder Nagra in Bend it Like Beckham.

We’ll see how Blades of Glory holds up in the long run, but I suspect that it will take its place alongside titles like Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle, Grosse Pointe Blank, and Old School in the pantheon of great comedies that are always circulating in my DVD player.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

it is obvious that you know nothing about the training judges go through in figure skating if you say the marks are given for "completely subjective reasons." as a masters in fine arts and a law student, you should be careful when you attempt to pontificate on areas in which you are completely ignorant. Every element now has a value and judges are scrutinized for every single mark and deduction. it is just as much a sport as track -- think about it, the judgement that is necessary to decide the winner requires a human to be involved. Human "judges" are present in all "sports." Where do you draw the line? Oh yeah, you're the guy who bases his "acceptance" of skating as a sport, at least in part, on a farcical, ridiculous, dare I say "b-movie" starring a funny guy who is stuck in a comedic rut and can't think of anything funnier than making fun of folks who are a bit over-the-top. I choose to think of skating as a sport, because I cannot draw the line against it and not make other sports like boxing, baseball and basketball also suspect.

Like most people who make this argument, they are working really hard to discredit something that they don't want to admit is a sport for an arbitrary reason that skaters don't compete directly against each other. As an Olympian and a veteran of the sport, I can assure you that there is quite a bit of competition between people, even if the judges make the final decision, kind of like when the clock makes the final decision between two speed skaters or two skiers, or two cyclists who compete in a time trial.


What is truly needed form people is a sense of respect for the sport of figure skating.

9:25 PM  
Blogger Brian said...

It's difficult to respond reasonably to a comment so filled with ad hominem fallacies. By suggesting that I’m ignorant and that I have learned nothing despite my educational background, the comment draws attention away from the content of the post and inserts anger and other emotions into the conversation at the expense of reasonable dialogue. Such things, of course, only undermine the credibility of the argument that uses them.

However, I do agree with you, mysterious anonymous person, that figure skating needs more respect. But it must earn that respect rather than simply demanding it and continuing to ignore its obvious faults. The judging system, most importantly, is clearly a serious fault that must be reformed. It has been extremely controversial and scandal-ridden for longer than I’ve been alive. The Salt Lake City games provided the most recent high-profile example, when two gold medals had to be awarded because of a corrupt French judge. Even more recently, but not as high profile, was the unexplainable result at the recent competition in Sweden, explained in detail here:

http://www.nationalpost.com/
sports/story.html?id=389369

(I've tried several things, but Blogger doesn't want to let me use a link in my comment here. However, if you copy and paste the 1st line and then the second line into a browser, the link works.)

How, in the wake of so many scandals, examples of misconduct, and inexplicable results, could this system for awarding medals at major international events be mistaken for anything approaching objective? Even if there are certain objective criteria, it’s obvious that the judges don’t always pay attention to those rules. Anchoring the subjective nature of the judging system is the artistic merit category. Artistic merit is inherently subjective. This does not mean that the category necessarily should be eliminated or that it’s bogus, but we must not pretend that it’s objective or even that it could be.

Of course, the real tragedy here is that the skaters lose. These are people with extraordinary physical gifts who have trained for their entire lifetimes in order to be able to skate like they do. We owe them a competitive system that’s better than the one in place now.

6:30 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home